Attending a continuing legal education conference on the legal business last week, I was surprised by how many panelists and audience members were citing Steve Jobs reverentially. The co-founder of Apple (and a nonlawyer) famously said that “A lot of times, people don’t know what they want until you show it to them.” See Chunka Mui, Five Dangerous Lessons to Learn From Steve Jobs, Forbes.com (Oct. 17, 2011), http://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2011/10/17/five-dangerous-lessons-to-learn-from-steve-jobs/. Apparently, a number of lawyers are enamored with the notion that sellers have to figure out a way to sell legal services to clients who don’t even know that they need them. But are iPads and product liability defense work really comparable? Or iPhones and bankruptcy filings?
As heartened as I was to see major law firms embracing business
practices, I thought the mention of Jobs in this context demonstrated some
callousness toward legal clients. I wish I’d heard more discussion of the other
side of Jobs, the brilliant thinker, the rejecting market-research Jobs, the
one who managed to come up with incredible products that many of us couldn’t
possibly imagine that we would someday need. And yet, today, we have them.
At the legal business conference I attended, though, I
sensed more desperation: that in a challenging time for major firms, some
lawyers are scrambling to sell you everything, anything, the coffee pot in the
conference room if need be, as a means simply to stay viable. I’d be more than
wary if I were a major corporate client of what my lawyers were now trying to
push. Sadly, I didn’t hear much talk of innovation or of developing an
incredible product or service that would change the legal world and the way
that clients consume legal services. Perhaps the big-law representatives
attending the conference have selected the right train, but they just might be
on the wrong track.
—Lori Tripoli
Lori - I see where you are coming from and you make some great points. That said, I think lawyers like Steve Jobs because he took an inaccessible, entrenched industry and - for lack of a better phrase - shook it up. Of course, this is not entirely attributable to Jobs. Really Jobs is the embodiment of Apple. Apple changed the way people think about products. In the same way, I think lawyers want to change the way people perceive legal services - accessible and user-friendly. Apple and Jobs are emulated across every industry. Why not legal? Enjoyed your post!
ReplyDeleteI'm with you on accessibility and user-friendliness, Patrick. I'm hopeful that BigLaw will be able to figure out a way to provide just that, but it just might take a guy working in his garage to do it.
ReplyDeleteLori